Evidensforskning: Positiva resultat av akupunktur med medicinering vid osteoartrit i knäled

British Medical Journal.
Av: Jorge Vas (chief medical officer), Camila Méndez (epidemiologist), Emilio Perea-Milla (chief medical officer), Evelia Vega (chief medical officer), María Dolores Panadero (pharmacologist), José María León (professor), Miguel Ángel Borge (chief medical off

Acupuncture as a complementary therapy to the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee:
Randomised controlled trial

Objectives – To analyse the efficacy of acupuncture as a complementary therapy to the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, with respect to pain relief, reduction of stiffness, and increased physical function during treatment; modifications in the consumption of diclofenac during treatment; and changes in the patient’s quality of life.
Design Randomised, controlled, single blind trial, with blinded evaluation and statistical analysis of results.

Setting Pain management unit in a public primary care centre in southern Spain, over a period of two years.

Participants 97 outpatients presenting with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Interventions Patients were randomly separated into two groups, one receiving acupuncture plus diclofenac (n = 48) and the other placebo acupuncture plus diclofenac (n = 49).

Main outcome measures The clinical variables examined included intensity of pain as measured by a visual analogue scale; pain, stiffness, and physical function subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index; dosage of diclofenac taken during treatment; and the profile of quality of life in the chronically ill (PQLC) instrument, evaluated before and after the treatment programme.

Results 88 patients completed the trial. In the intention to treat analysis, the WOMAC index presented a greater reduction in the intervention group than in the control group (mean difference 23.9, 95% confidence interval 15.0 to 32.8) The reduction was greater in the subscale of functional activity. The same result was observed in the pain visual analogue scale, with a reduction of 26.6 (18.5 to 34.8). The PQLC results indicate that acupuncture treatment produces significant changes in physical capability (P = 0.021) and psychological functioning (P = 0.046). Three patients reported bruising after the acupuncture sessions.

Conclusions Acupuncture plus diclofenac is more effective than placebo acupuncture plus diclofenac for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Introduction
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of joint disease, and its most common location is the knee.1 As the population ages or the disease worsens, osteoarthritis is associated with incapacity and a deteriorating quality of life owing to increased pain, loss of mobility, and the consequent loss of functional independence.2 The general increase in life expectancy means that increasing numbers of people present with osteoarthritis of the knee and have a reduced quality of life.
The role of acupuncture in osteoarthritis of the knee is still a matter of controversy, and few comparative studies of acupuncture and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for its treatment have been conducted.3 A recent systematic review concluded that a moderate degree of evidence exists that the effect of the acupuncture treatment could be due to the placebo,4 and further studies are therefore necessary to determine the true role of acupuncture.

We analysed the efficacy of acupuncture as a complementary therapy to the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Materials and methods
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Study design and subjects
We conducted a randomised, controlled trial with blinded evaluation and statistical analysis of results.
We used the following criteria for inclusion in the study: patients had to be aged 45 years or older, with pain in one or both knees for the preceding three months or longer, and with radiological evidence of osteoarthritis of the knee (at least grade 1 according to the Ahlbäck classification,5 see bmj.com). Criteria for exclusion were previous treatment with acupuncture; contraindication to medication with diclofenac; inflammatory, metabolic, or neuropathic arthropathies; severe concomitant illnesses that might interfere with the clinical evaluation of the patient; severe or generalised dermopathy; pregnancy or existing treatment with antineoplasic, corticoid, or immunosuppressive drugs.

We assigned the patients randomly to an intervention group treated with acupuncture plus diclofenac, and a control group given placebo acupuncture plus diclofenac.

Treatment applied
Pharmacological
The patients in both groups received a bag with 21 tablets (50 mg) of diclofenac for the week (50 mg to be taken every 8 hours) and the instruction to reduce the dose if symptoms improved.

True and placebo acupuncture
A doctor specialising in acupuncture (accredited by the Beijing University of Medical Sciences (China) and by the Scientific Society of Medical Acupuncture (ACMAS Huangdi, Spain)) selected acupuncture points on the basis of traditional treatment methods found to be effective for osteoarthritis of the knee (see bmj.com).6 7 The treatment lasted 12 weeks, starting with visit 0 and ending with visit 11. The doctor carried out the final evaluation at visit 12, one week after the treatment had ended.

The same specialist carried out the placebo acupuncture, at the same frequency and for the same duration as for the group receiving the true intervention. Retractable needles went into small adhesive cylinders, such that the needle was supported but did not perforate the skin.8 The acupuncturist then placed the needles over the same points as were used for the true acupuncture group.

Efficacy end points
We used as the primary efficacy end point the WOMAC index9 and its three subscales (pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8), and physical function (0-68)), pain in the knee on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100, the dosage of diclofenac accumulated, and the profile of quality of life in the chronically ill (PQLC) instrument.10

Analysis
We analysed the results by intention to treat. For patients who withdrew, the score we used for each variable was the worst of the scores obtained for the intervention group and the best obtained for the control group. When a diagnosis of bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee had been made, the knee with the worst results at baseline was the knee we evaluated in the final analysis.

Results
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Recruitment took place between January 2001 and December 2002. We selected 97 patients to participate in the study, all of whom agreed to take part. We found no clinically relevant differences in the variables that we analysed (total WOMAC, pain visual analogue scale, PQLC) at baseline (table 1). Of the nine patients who dropped out of the study, one out of 48 was in the treatment group and abandoned the programme because of fear of the acupuncture process, and eight of 49 (16%) were in the control group (six left owing to lack of improvement and two for personal reasons). Adverse effects after acupuncture treatment were limited to three patients who reported bruising at one of the acupuncture points (SP9).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1 Baseline data; comparison of the randomised groups by treatment type. Values are numbers (percentages) of participants unless otherwise indicated

The WOMAC index presented a greater, and significant, reduction in the intervention group than in the control group (mean difference 23.9, 95% confidence interval 15.0 to 32.8); the magnitude of the reduction was greater in the subscale of functional activity (17.5, 11.0 to 24.0). The same result was observed in the pain visual analogue scale (reduction 26.6, 18.5 to 34.8). A reduction of 53.9 was observed in the total accumulated number of diclofenac tablets for the intervention group compared with the control group (24.7 to 83.1). The PQLC results indicate that acupuncture treatment produces significant changes in physical capability and psychological functioning (table 2).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2 Bivariant analysis by intention to treat. Data are mean (SD) scores

Discussion
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Mean results
Acupuncture as a complementary therapy to pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee is more effective than pharmacological treatment alone, in terms of reducing pain and rigidity, and improving physical functioning and health related quality of life.
According to the criterion that an improvement in quality of life requires changes in at least two of the variables measured by the PQLC, the acupuncture provided to the intervention group was more effective than the placebo treatment in improving patients’ quality of life.

Limitations of the study
Observation of the sample groups over a period of 12 weeks may be insufficient to evaluate the effects of treatment in the medium term. Moreover, we did not test the patients’ awareness of belonging to one or the other group, and so their complete “blindness” cannot be assured. Another possible limitation was the absence of techniques to verify the behaviour of the therapist, although the time spent with each patient was recorded; this was always close to the mean value (29.4 minutes).

Taking into account the duration of the study (12 weeks), we recorded patients’ body mass index at the beginning and the end of the study, to evaluate the possible confounding effect of weight loss or gain. We found no significant differences.

We used different measurement techniques to evaluate the results obtained, testing whether the changes were all in the same direction and checking the consistency of the efficacy end points. We decided to use the categorical version of the WOMAC index because of the low cultural level of the population in the study area, and Spain’s index of quality of life (PQLC) as a valid test for chronically ill patients. We considered the “total accumulated consumption of diclofenac” an objective variable with which to measure the responses of the two sample groups. As osteoarthritis is still an incurable illness, treatment is fundamentally aimed at improving the patient’s quality of life, which is why we included this variable in the study. The consistency of the results is endorsed by the fact that the different aspects of physical functioning improved, according to both indices, the WOMAC and the PQLC. It is noteworthy that the evaluators were unaware of the group to which the patient had been assigned.

Comparison with other studies and outlook
The studies published to date have methodological deficiencies in the description and application of the method chosen for randomisation, the concealment of the treatment assignation scheme, the homogeneity of the groups to be compared, the control of co-interventions, the lack of control over participants’ compliance with medical instructions, and the “blinding” of patients and evaluators. The heterogeneity of follow up periods was high.11-14 We attempted to improve on the methodological design of previous work, using a controlled, single blind, randomised trial with evaluation and analysis by third parties; the sample size was appropriate, and we controlled for possible confounding factors to a suitable degree; the professionals involved were suitably qualified; the placebo was adequately chosen; and the quality control of the materials used was ensured. We put particular emphasis on ascertaining the patient’s sensation of Deqi when acupuncture was applied, and on describing secondary effects and the success of the technique in improving the patient’s quality of life (PQLC).

What is already known on this topic
Acupuncture is widely used to treat chronic pain in osteoarthritis

Various clinical trials have indicated that acupuncture may be beneficial in treating the pain that arises from osteoarthritis

The placebos used in earlier trials, based on stimulation by transcutaneous penetration, achieved an excessively high success rate, possibly owing to the neurophysiological and neurochemical responses caused by stimulation of the cutaneous receptors

The methodological quality of previous studies, in terms of randomisation, homogeneity of the groups compared, blinding, and other factors, has been put into question

What this study adds

Acupuncture, as a complementary therapy to pharmacological treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee, is more effective than pharmacological treatment alone

This manifests itself in terms of pain relief, easing stiffness, and improving physical function

Similar results were found in a small, short term and long term study, carried out by using the waiting list as the control group,11 and in another study that compared acupuncture plus baseline treatment with baseline treatment alone.12 In these studies, the absence of a placebo was a serious limitation to the validity of the conclusions; a third study incorporated a placebo, but in a hospital environment considered to be of low quality,4 whereas treatment was of greater intensity and duration of treatment was shorter.13 Another study compared acupuncture with sham acupuncture and found no statistically significant differences.14

Future research should extend the observation period after treatment in order to evaluate the duration of the improvement obtained and to establish treatment protocols.

——————————————————————————–
See also p 1220
This is the abridged version of an article that was posted on bmj.com on 19 October 2004: http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj38238.601447.3A

We thank M J Cano, J G de Hoyos, E Bassas, and C Andrés for their work in the conduct of the study, and J G de Hoyos for his useful comments on the initial protocol.

Contributors: See bmj.com.

Funding: This study was partly financed by Servicio Andaluz de Salud (Grant No 192/99). The acupuncture materials and the drugs used in the study were provided by the Sevilla-Sur health district authorities.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Valme Hospital Ethics Committee, Seville.

References
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Creamer P, Hochberg MC. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 1997;350: 503-8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Felson DT. The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham osteoarthritis study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990;20(3 suppl 1): 42-50.[ISI][Medline]
Perrot S, Menkes CJ. Nonpharmacological approaches to pain in osteoarthritis. Available options. Drugs 1996;52(suppl 3): 21-6.[ISI][Medline]
Ferrandez IA, Garcia OL, Gonzalez GA, Meis Meis MJ, Sanchez Rodriguez BM. [Effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of pain from osteoarthritis of the knee]. Aten Primaria 2002;30(10): 602-8. (In Spanish.)[Medline]
Ahlbäck S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968;(suppl 72).
Cheng XN. Chinese acupuncture and moxibustion. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1987.
Cobos R, Vas J. Manual de Acupuntura y Moxibustión. Beijing: Morning Glory; 2000.
Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research. Lancet 1998;352: 364-5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15: 1833-40.[ISI][Medline]
Siegrist J, Broer M, Junge A. Profil der Lebensqualität Chronischkranker (PLC). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag, 1996.
Christensen BV, Iuhl IU, Vilbek H, Bulow HH, Dreijer NC, Rasmussen HF. Acupuncture treatment of severe knee osteoarthrosis. A long-term study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992;36: 519-25.[ISI][Medline]
Berman BM, Singh BB, Lao L, Langenberg P, Li H, Hadhazy V, et al. A randomized trial of acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999;38: 346-54.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yurtkuran M, Kocagil T. TENS, electroacupuncture and ice massage: comparison of treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Acupunct 1999;27(3-4): 133-40.[Medline]
Takeda W, Wessel J. Acupuncture for the treatment of pain of osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Care Res 1994;7(3): 118-22.[Medline]
(Accepted 7 September 2004)

Related Articles
Acupuncture helps treat osteoarthritis
BMJ 2004 329: 0. [Full Text]

The orthopaedic approach to managing osteoarthritis of the knee
Sam Gidwani and Adrian Fairbank
BMJ 2004 329: 1220-1224. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:
(Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

White, A., Foster, N. E., Cummings, M., Barlas, P. (2007). Acupuncture treatment for chronic knee pain: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46: 384-390 [Abstract] [Full text]
Kwon, Y. D., Pittler, M. H., Ernst, E. (2006). Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 1331-1337 [Abstract] [Full text]
(2006). Acupuncture.. Obstet Gynecol 108: 1024-1026 [Full text]
Scharf, H.-P., Mansmann, U., Streitberger, K., Witte, S., Kramer, J., Maier, C., Trampisch, H.-J., Victor, N. (2006). Acupuncture and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Three-Armed Randomized Trial. ANN INTERN MED 145: 12-20 [Abstract] [Full text]
D’Vaz, A. P., Ostor, A. J. K., Speed, C. A., Jenner, J. R., Bradley, M., Prevost, A. T., Hazleman, B. L. (2006). Pulsed low-intensity ultrasound therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 566-570 [Abstract] [Full text]
Rubin, B. R. (2005). Management of Osteoarthritic Knee Pain. JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 105: S23-S28 [Abstract] [Full text]
Lehman, R. (2005). Evidently…. Evid. Based Med. 10: 39-39 [Full text]
(2005). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 10: 63-64 [Full text]
(2005). Hit parade. BMJ 330: 485-485 [Full text]
(2005). Acupuncture Relieves Symptoms of Knee OA. JWatch General 2005: 3-3 [Full text]
Rapid Responses:
________________
BMJ 2004;329:1216 (20 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.38238.601447.3A (published 19 October 2004)

1 Pain Treatment Unit, Centro de Salud “Dos Hermanas A” (Distrito Sanitario Sevilla-Sur), 41700 Dos Hermanas, Spain, 2 Distrito Sanitario Sevilla-Sur, Alcalá de Guadaira 41500, Spain, 3 Research Support Unit, Hospital Costa del Sol, 29600 Marbella, Spain, 4 Department of Social Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, 41018 Sevilla, Spain, 5 Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Servicio de Ordenación Sanitaria, 41001 Sevilla, Spain, 6 Municipal Medical Services, 41927 Mairena del Aljarafe, Spain, 7 Pain Treatment Unit, Centro de Salud “Castilleja de la Cuesta,” 41950 Castilleja de la Cuesta, Spain
Correspondence to: J Vas jvas@acmas.com
Publicerad: |2007-03-16|